News Section

Updates and relevant information at NYUA


Happy holidays to all! Its been another amazing year.  2014 brought so many new challenges to the practice, new patients with numerous concerns.   Through the year we tackled all to keep providing you with good healthcare services.

We had multiple interesting and challenging health problems to help our patients with and are happy to say we were able to help in great measure.  From medical treatments to surgical procedures our patients were tended to through the year and even today we have new cases to add.

Thanks all for your support through the year.  We want to wish you all a belated Merry Christmas and a very happy and prosperous New Year, 2015! We’re looking forward to leading the way in Urological care for our patients in this beautiful city New York and those who seek our care from all over the world.


Kidney Stones: A Patient’s Perspective 3

Kidney Stones: A Patient’s Perspective 3

Kidney Stones in 2013

Thirty years later, I came down with yet another kidney stone.  Having experienced one back in ‘84 was enough for me to cringe at the possibilities.  However nowadays we have more advanced medications like alpha blockers which can help facilitate passage of small stones. We used Toradol for pain, which is non narcotic.  In the process of diagnostics, we used a CT scan, which are easier and quicker to perform and do not require IV contrast.  CT scans also provide more information to help with the treatment process. Once the stone was found treatment was decided.  We had some options.  One of which was ESWL (Extra-corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy) which was not available back in 84.  This procedure is non invasive.

However for my stone, a urethral stone extraction was done.  Today’s instruments are more advanced and much smaller.  This helped reduce pain and trauma during the procedure. This was carried out at an out patient facility.  After the extraction was performed a stent was placed in.  This was a more tolerable experience due to the softness and flexibility of today’s Stents.  Additionally, the stent was removed in only 3 days.

 All in all, treatment for kidney stones has advanced vastly.  From medications to instrumentation we have great options to help you with this problem in an efficient and effective manner.


Conversations with our Urologists

Conversations with our Urologists

We recently took some time to actually talk to some of our Urologists.

As a practice, we all spend a lot of time together.  Its that kind of family like relationship, where sometimes you cant stand your little brother, or get annoyed at your dad not letting you go out this or that night.  Oh, the memories!  After spending some time with our doctors, not interviewing them but just talking to them outside of their Doctor like environment we came to realize how much like you and me they are (yes behind the MD title there is a person too).  They are people with the same concerns we have and then some.  Namely, taking care of you as a patient and us as their employees.

In the last few months, we have talked to them for some time.   While you may think its just urology, its amazing how passionate they are about the cases they are working on and about their trade.  Urology, Medicine they’re trades too, also an art in some ways.  These require attention and keeping tabs on new techniques and/or medications to treat you know who?  You.  They sometimes get together over coffee and discuss some of their patients with the other Doctor’s in the practice.   They do so with the utmost concern and passion, which sometimes is very inspiring.  We as administrative staff may not know the medical lingo the way they do, but its kinda funny to hear them talk about some technique or the other for a surgical case.  They are excited about it, about the challenge that those surgical procedures entail and how they’re ready to help YOU beat what ails you.  On occasion we’ve asked them how did it go with this patient and his kidney stones, or the other with their bladder tumor? How did it go with that urethral repair? Its great to see them happy with each successful case.  As with every thing not all cases have a single treatment solution, but the doctors come back with more information to create the next step in treatment.  No, not all cases are surgery.  Some are office treatment courses, or studies that help them figure out problems.

On top of having the constant pressure of dealing with their day to day life, they are concerned about you their patient.  Besides this, many of our Urologists also lecture at teaching hospitals.  It had been our impression that their work day was mostly 9-5 when in the office and which ever surgery cases they had at the hospital.  Well, its not just that.  Many times they arrive at our office after teaching at the hospital, presenting some conference at 730am. When thinking about that, consider that some of the doctors in our practice come from Long Island or New Jersey!

Medicine is not all glamor.  Understanding all they do puts everything into perspective.  It takes a lot of sacrifice and dedication, that not many people are willing to make.  After coming to this understanding about the doctors at our practice, we have new found respect for them.  We may complain sometimes about a stressful day at the office, and that’s fine, but now when we do, we also remember that these doctors we’re working for, never leave the proverbial office because they’re always available in some form to take care of their/our patients.

To ALL Urologists in our practice, and doctors everywhere we have to say thanks for letting us assist in the privilege of caring for your patients!


Save time Register Online!

We’ve received great feedback with our online appointment requests.  Many of our existing patients have enjoyed the convenience.  If you want to avoid the phone, or being on hold and don’t have an urgent appointment, request it online.

If you are a NEW PATIENT, take advantage of our ONLINE PATIENT REGISTRATION FORM.  We need all your information in order to create your account and make your appointment.  If you register online, after requesting your appointment, we’ll be able to check your insurance for participation, have your information in our system and even make your appointment and just send you a confirmatory email. It will also save you some time at the office, all you will need to do is review and sign the forms, no more filling them out.

This also benefits new patients whom want to update their information.

Save time, register online!


Urinary Incontinence and Prolapse, a patients account

Ms. X is a middle aged woman with two children. Ever since the delivery of her last baby, she developed urinary leakage.  It happened when she coughed or had a heavy cold. Over the last three years, she recalls that the leakage got worse. Not only did she have a problem when she had a cold, but she leaked during her workouts, or even if she tripped off the curb or suddenly dashed for the subway.  The constant leaks had a great impact in her active lifestyle and self esteem.  She begun to wear a pad every day, and sometimes she wore a heavy pad.  Ms. X said that she felt a heaviness and pressure in her pelvis, usually by the end of the day.

Her gynecologist recommended that she have a consultation with our office regarding treatment. On examination, she was found to have a dropped bladder, which would account for the heavy feeling in the pelvis. Urine squirted out of her urethra when she was asked to cough during the pelvic examination.  Her problems were fairly clear to us by the end of the consultation.

A Urodynamics test at our office was done to determine how we could best help her.  Once her problem was better defined we scheduled outpatient surgery.  During that session we would correct both the dropped bladder and the urinary incontinence problem. She took off two weeks from work post surgery to allow her to rest and heal.

Since the surgical procedure she feels great with resolution of both of her problems.  Ms. X is no longer experiencing leakage during her day to day activities.  She now enjoys her workouts and has had no need to wear pads.  Her quality of life and self esteem have improved greatly.  She indicated in our last visit that she is ready to get out there are start dating.  Unfortunately, we can’t help her in that department!


Kidney Stones, a patient’s perspective pt 2

Kidney Stones, a patient’s perspective pt 2

Kidney Stones in 1986

Having experienced kidney stones twice in the past 30 years (see A Kidney Stone, a patient’s perspective) has given me some good insights, which I share with our patients at the New York offices from time to time.  There are many aspects involved with diagnosis and treatment of kidney stones. Fortunately, our diagnostic and treatment options have improved significantly. Over time the art and science in treating kidney stones has improved vastly.  I say art since not all stones are treated in the same way.

When I suffered my first kidney stone attack in 1984 diagnostic and treatment options were limited.  During that episode the pain was unforgettable.  It was like nothing I had ever experienced. At the time the mainstay of pain management consisted of narcotics which carry significant side effects.  Patients where prescribed Percocet and/or  morphine which did dull the pain caused by kidney stones but carried side effects of nausea, dizziness and constipation.  The diagnostic options at the time of my first attack consisted of plain x-ray and intravenous pyelography (IVP). IVPs are rarely done today. This type of x ray was time consuming and and required an injection of dye into the bloodstream to locate the stone.  X-rays do however deliver significant radiation exposure.

In 1984, I was unable to pass my stone (3-4mm) which was located in my left ureter (tube which transports urine from the kidney to the bladder) and caused intense and constant pain.  There was no form of medical therapy at that time. My treatment consisted of a surgical procedure called ureteroscopy and stone extraction. At that time the instruments were large and cumbersome.  During this procedure, the doctor inserts the ureteroscope through the urethra, into the bladder and then into the affected ureter.  There he uses the instrument to visualize and grasp the stone to remove it.  In some cases, the doctor has to break the stone into smaller fragments and remove them one at a time.  The smallest pieces are to pass normally during urination.  I underwent this procedure which lasted 2-3 hours and I was kept in the hospital for 3 days. The pain from the procedure was severe.  After the procedure an ureteral stent was inserted to keep the ureter open and allow urine to flow from the kidney into the bladder.  The ureteral stent was kept in place for one week.  It left me with significant sympthoms.  After it was removed, I slowly returned to my normal day to day activities.

In hindsight, the progress we have made over the last 30 years in treating kidney stones is amazing .  Im glad we at New York Urological in Manhattan have access to much advanced methods for treatment today.   I’ll be discussing my most recent experience in my next post for comparison of all aspects; from diagnosis through treatment.  We know how it feels and understand that prompt and efficient treatment are the key to a better experience.


We’re open in the snow!

We’re open in the snow!

Snow is such a beautiful thing! Makes everything look so clean and adds this nice serene feel to the scene.  However it still causes some delays with transportation and other public services.  We’re open and ready to help with your urological problems.  Kidney stones don’t wait, urinary frequency doesn’t relent and prostate issues don’t take a break because of the weather.

Be careful in your commute today everyone!


Deductible Season 2014

One of the most common challenges for any practice during the beginning of the year is collecting in network deductibles (a set amount of dollars billable to the patient).  Most insurance policy deductibles reset on January 1st every year.  Many of our patients come to us early in the year, with that concern in mind.  Medicare policies thankfully are simple enough, one deductible of $147.00 for the first claim or claims processed during the year.

For private insurance (Aetna, BCBS, Cigna, HIP, Oxford, United Healthcare)  is a little bit more complicated.  Private insurance deductibles are assigned in different ways, at times we wont know the specifics until a claim is processed.   Some policies work like Medicare and deductibles are assigned to the first claim, regardless of the services on it.  However, other policies are a bit more intricate and will assign deductibles based on type of service billed.  Yes, patients have their booklets that inform them of potential deductible allocations however, this information sometimes is not detailed enough.  Even when calling insurance to verify benefits, you wont know that while your policy will not have a deductible for your visit services, it may have it for medical procedures or for imaging services in the same date.

Its important for our patient population to keep in mind, that fees assigned to their Deductibles will be billed to them directly.  We advise that they put aside some funds every year (some policies/employers provide Health Savings Accounts for that purpose) to address deductibles in their policies.  This way those couple of hundred that might be billed to you will be easier to pay.

If you have any questions, please contact our billing office and we’ll go over your information.


To PSA or not to PSA, that is the question

We just can’t escape the constant chatter regarding the two extremes: screen everyone vs. screen no one.  We were recently discussing  a blog which likened the dangers of PSA screening to the harm caused by performing prostate biopsies on prisoners in the early 60’s without their consent.  These men had terrible consequences: rectal injury, incontinence, impotence etc. as the anatomy of the prostate and its surrounding structures was not well known until the late 80’s. This comparison is extreme and clearly the situation regarding lack of informed consent is completely inappropriate and a whole different problem. As urologists, we first discuss PSA’s potential benefits as well as limitations.  While it is true that PSA is not the be all and end all, it most definitely plays an important role in diagnosis and follow-up, as does the DRE (digital rectal exam).  While this exam is unlikely to be the highlight of your day it is helpful and we do notice subtle changes over the years as we come to “know you and your prostate”.  There are many factors that we take into consideration before recommending biopsy to patients.  These include the absolute PSA value when making comparisons across age groups and race; rate of rise (velocity); doubling time; density of PSA when taking into account the size of the gland; free % of PSA; genetic markers; family history and changes in the exam. While true that a high value on one occasion should not automatically prompt a biopsy, if repeatedly elevated more information may often be better. When a cancer is diagnosed, we consider the patient’s co-morbidities and life expectancy before making recommendations regarding: to treat or not to treat and if treatment is recommended, how to treat.

We believe that physicians and patients alike should have all of the information that is safely (and biopsy is still relatively safe when given appropriate antibiotics) and readily available to them in order to make educated decisions.  Patients are empowered by more information and it often guides their medical decisions.  While we understand that not every high PSA reading requires immediate biopsy and not all biopsy proven cancers require intervention,  we do believe that a patient and their doctor have a “right to know” if they are harboring a cancer.  Clearly, the hope is that more specific markers will become readily available to determine those patients whose prostate cancer is destined to have a negative effect and therefore those to whom treatment is recommended. There are already complex genetic tests available though not frequently used at present.

Many like to say that “only 3 out of 100 men diagnosed with prostate cancer will die from their disease”, but they fail to mention the potential symptoms. Urinary complaints with possible gross blood in the urine as the disease progresses, bone fractures or SRE’s (skeletal related events), or metastases can precipitate a miserable existence. We have all seen extreme cases where a man may awaken unable to walk due to lower extremity muscle weakness due to spinal cord compression.  This often requires emergent surgery. In the “DONT SCREEN PSA” side, many also ignore the fact that there was not one urologist, medical oncologist or radiation oncologist on the US Preventive Services Task Force Panel that came up with the recommendation D status against PSA testing in anyone.  How did psychiatrists, pediatricians and nurses end up on the panel? These are independently assigned panels, but they are not comprised of physicians who treat the specific disease processes on which they’re expected to comment.  Many are also unaware of proper interpretation of the data. Task forces have been known to be wrong, and if not wrong, sometimes change their opinion based on data outcomes.  This is apparent in the recent change of the USPSTFP panel which recommends a yearly low dose CT scan of the chest in smokers who are 55-79 yo and who are high risk. This was defined as having “a 30 pack year smoking history”, meaning they smoked a pack per day for 30 years, or 2 packs per day for 15 years,etc.  The National Lung Cancer Society and American Cancer Society generally support this and recommend that “a thorough discussion be held regarding the pros and cons of and serious consideration be given” to annual CT Chest  scanning.   All involved in these recommendations readily acknowledge the risks of radiation and detection of many false positive lesions.  These findings may even lead to further imaging and/or procedures that have their own associated risks.  Despite this, CT scans should still be considered as it has become clear over the last eight years that this policy saves lives.

It is also very clear when comparing populations in the pre and post PSA era that screening has saved lives, even when done every second or even fourth year, as shown in numerous studies.  This is apparent if one reads and is able to correctly interpret the data of multiple large trials from the USA and Europe which have recently matured and provide compelling evidence.  Unfortunately, one of the three largest randomized controlled trials (Goteborg trial) that looked at prostate cancer specific mortality, was excluded from the USPSTF’s consideration.  Not only do we know that the risk of mortality is decreased, but one must not ignore the even greater benefit earlier detection has had on decreasing the risk of metastatic disease. Metastatic disease at diagnosis has decreased by 75% in the USA since PSA was introduced.  We should not take this for granted.

There is no doubt that PSA testing should be used judiciously and that it is our responsibility as physicians to be aware of the data, understand it and present it to our patients in a clear and concise manner.  A list of the pros and cons of any test and/or intervention should be provided.  While we definitely need better tests for diagnosis and for assessing the degree of risk the disease may pose to the individual patient, the constant push to eliminate PSA is absurd. There is admittedly “over-diagnosis, under-utilization of active surveillance, and over-treatment”, but this does not eliminate the value of screening.



Female Incontinence, some patients ask:

Many female patients come to us with similar urinary related concerns.  Some of these may be affecting you as well.  Follow these posts as we address many of these issues.  Please note these Q&A are not treatment advise but simplified answers to general issues that affect many women alike.  If you or anyone you know has some or any of these symptoms, please call for appointment or visit your preferred doctor.  Ladies, don’t your lifestyle be defined by your urinary problems.

Q: Are female incontinence and urinary frequency an inevitable part of aging?
A: Although female incontinence, urinary frequency and urgency are more common in women as they get older, not every woman will leak urine as she ages. If you feel that you are going to the bathroom more often or that you need a pad because of urinary leakage, treatments are available to help manage your bladder.

Q: How can I prevent incontinence and do I have to take medication? Are there holistic treatments for this problem?

A: Urinary incontinence cannot be prevented but it can be managed if the problem is interfering with your quality of life. The first line intention is behavior modification, which includes urinating at fixed interval (for example, every two hours), managing fluid intake based on the availability of a bathroom, and kegel exercises. If these efforts fail to control the leakage, medication is available.